VANCOUVER SUN JULY 31, 1997 VICTORIA--The B.C. government made its first tentative step toward rejoining the country's constitutional debate after five years of virtual silence Wednesday, releasing a report that flirts with B.C. separatism while showing hostility toward distinct society status for Quebec. The report, put together by Premier Glen Clark's special constitutional advisor Gordon Wilson, represents a dramatic departure from the B.C. government's courtship of Quebec throughout the Meech Lake and Charlottetown accord debates. And while Clark shied away from embracing the report Wednesday, he suggested it will provide the framework for a made-in-B.C. stance for the next round of constitutional talks. "I'll have to take a look at it, but I think there is a need for more discussion in British Columbia about a unique B.C. position , so this will be grist for that mill." Clark said. The six-volume report includes a number of voices on B.C.'s place in the nation, but taken together it amounts to the hardest line on Canadian unity put forward by a B.C. government in modern times. Wilson, the lone MLA for the Progressive Democratic Alliance, was appointed to the $100,000 project last year by Clark to help B.C. find its way back to a position on the Constitution since the government limped away from Charlottetown five years ago. Wilson outlines a number of ways for the country to strengthen national unity without reopening the Constitution. But the "what if" scenario of Quebec separation is the underlying theme. "There are ways the government can act immediately to try to build a renewed Canada in advance of constitutional amendments," Wilson told reporters Wednesday. "However we also recognize the reality of the potential for a 'yes' vote in Quebec and we recommend the government, concurrently while working on building the country, put in place a contingency plan in the event of that reality......My personal opinion is that British Columbia is not likely to simply acquiesce to a rest-of-Canada model including British Columbia." Wilson and his panel of authors all agreed that if the federal government's approach toward national unity does not change, Quebecers will vote to separate in the next four years. The likely target of controversy is the volume written by former B.C. Liberal leader Gordon Gibson who outlines the province's options if Quebec votes to separate. An independent nation of B.C. is viable, Gibson concludes. "This option would work perfectly well, in both economic and political terms," Gibson writes. An independent B.C. wouldn't need to spend on defence, would have free trade with Hong Kong and use the U.S. dollar as currency, he says. "There is no doubt [that] leaders exist in British Columbia with the necessary talent to lead an independent country." He also spelled out other options for B.C. that include creating a loose federation of the western provinces, a partnership of B.C. and Alberta or a union with the American states of Washington and Oregon. University of Victoria political science professor Norman Ruff said he couldn't find a road map for future discussions in the entire six volumes, but predicted it could cause a national stir because it comes on the eve of a premier's conference next week in New Brunswick. "There isn't a very clear action plan coming from it," Ruff said. But he added: "It think Clark will be comfortable with a discussion around the kinds of questions Gibson raises." Rafe Mair, the CKNW radio talk show host who took a lead role in urging B.C. voters to reject the Charlottetown accord, writes that the country will split if Ottawa amends the constitution to grant special status to Quebec. "Separation would no longer be a phrase for the pubs and the cocktail parties in B.C., it would be a real movement which would soon find a credible leader." He says Quebecers must be told clearly what the consequences of separation will be and at the same time the rest of Canada has to engage in a "lovemaking process" to sell them on staying. There is "no way" British Columbians will continue in a country where half of their MPs come from Ontario, Mair adds, but he stopped short of offering a solution. "In the event of a break-up of the country, the people of B.C. will expect that their government has prepared for that unpleasant occurrence. That places the government in a very dicey position but, the, that's what politicians get paid all that money for."